Who is Peter Block? Who is Barry Oshry for that Matter?

CCD - Connection/Commonality Deficit - comes in many forms ranging from the unspeakably horrendous - slavery, genocide, ethnic cleansing - to the simply puzzling. A few weeks ago I was talking with a student deep into her doctorate work in organizational psychology.  During the conversation I mentioned Peter Block only to  be met by a look of incomprehension. Never heard of him. This struck me as bizarre; Peter's books have sold in the multiple hundreds of thousands and have been translated in several languages. One book - Flawless Consulting - has been recognized by the Organization Development Network as the most influential book for Organization Development Specialists over the past 40 years. Peter's awards have been numerous and the workshops he has offered through Designed Learning have influenced the lives of thousands. O.K., so maybe this was a small gap in her education. Ten days later I had the opportunity to test an emerging hypothesis with a second student also engaged in a doctoral program in organizational psychology.  Same result, no recognition.  It's likely that both students have their lists of researchers whose names are totally unfamiliar to me and, possibly, also to Peter. I may be drawing too sharp a picture, but other evidence also indicates one field - Organization - with two nests, feathered independently of one another. There are the Academics doing academic things in academia, and there are the what?...the Populars?... doing their writing, and training, and consulting as best they can without much concern for its solid, theoretical, research-based, academic grounding.

I have my own dog in this fight. I am nested among the Populars, yet I also feel like I belong in the nest of the Academics. The Human Systems framework presented in Seeing Systems and Leading Systems may be the best existing theoretical work on organization life. It meets all the criteria of theory: describes, predicts, offers more comprehensive diagnoses and intervention strategies than other theories.  The problem is - what with  tales of earthworms and slugs, poetry,  he/she dialogues,  and talking diagrams  - it just doesn't  look academic.

I suppose I could try to write differently, like I could also try to be taller. On the other hand: Loosen up, Academics! Pay attention,not all academics needs to be academic.

Comments

[Sue Brightman]

As an OD consultant working with many organizations, I consider it my obligation to recommend models and interventions that will solve problems and make a practical difference in people's effectiveness. Whether my recommendation is from the Academic or Popular "nest", the client probably doesn't care ... nor do I! What matters is that it's based on solid, time-tested experience; that it holds true from one situation/culture/organization to another; and that it works. When I facilitate the Oshry Organization Workshop (as I did last month) and people tell me it caused a "eureka factor" for them, I know there's truth to the material. In my view, the world of academia needs to include material that will arm students with what works for organizations (their eventual clients) -- and that provides students with necessary fundamentals for their own knowledge. In my view, then, that would include Peter Block. And Barry Oshry.

[Ilene Wasserman]

Barry -- thank you for writing this. As you know I am a graduate of Fielding Graduate University. Given Fielding's commitment to the integration of scholarship or academics and practice, I think the work of the greats -- Peter, you, Marv Weisbord, and other people who work at the intersection and integration of great models and interventions grounded in solid theoretical underpinnings -- has been kept alive. In our practice, I have so valued not only the work of our mentors -- but the stories of the evolution of the work and their relationships has been critical to pass along. (I am sure you recall many a moment when I asked you to tell the ___ story again!)

I recent has a similar disorienting moment -- when I heard that someone had not heard of one of the grandparents of FGU. Hearing your Peter story on the heals of my recent encounter only further supports my commitment to keep these stories alive.

warmly, Ilene

[Hilary Rowland]

This is a subject very close to my heart. I don't think it matters where you are nested, but there is a real need for each party to listen and talk to each other. Practitioners have a lot to learn from academics and vice-versa. I am more generally horrified by practitioners who have no idea where their interventions come from as there are often quite different philosophical assumptions which underpin them and I don't think clients are best served by a bit of this and a bit of that. Academics tend not to be paid lots of money for their thoughts so perhaps it matters less what they think! What we offer clients does matter though.

[zechariah aloysius hillyard]

This is a price you pay for exploration. New ground (or ground that exists that simply has gone undiscovered or ignored) means that acceptance is not guaranteed. Even quantifiable, provable, and demonstrable evidence (Copernicus and his assertion that the Earth revolves around the Sun) have often been met with cynicism, violence, accusations of delusions of grandeur, imprisonment, internment, and interment (or threats thereof).

Please keep what doing what you are doing as you see fit. I think Mr. Block asserts that accountability means that we need to be prepared for this type of reaction.

Warm Regards,
z

[Viki Hurst]

I am so very grateful to the professor in my graduate program at the University of San Diego who introduced her classes to Margaret Wheatley, Peter Block and Marv Weisborg. At the time, I believe she was the only academic to put mainstream books on her reading lists, giving us all a much needed break from the dry expanses of theory and research (not that they aren't important).

[Amateur Boy Porn]

now I stay in touch!

[Black Ass Tranny]

any content coming ?