Andre Ross Sorkin in today's New York Times makes a case for honoring the AIG bonuses - his position being that honoring legal contracts is an essential foundation for enterprise; it would be chaotic if corporations, whether recipients of bailout packages or not, could simply choose to break a legal contract. Let's accept that. Still, the question is: Why would those bonuses be paid out of government stimulus money? AIG should pay its bonuses out of its pre-stimulus fund. Isn't that what it would have had to do if there had been no bailout? Pay the bonuses, but not with our money!
Excellent and common sense suggestion!
Posted by: zechariah aloysius hillyard | April 09, 2009 at 04:08 AM